|Create Date||July 31, 2018|
Screening for resistance to Yam Anthracnose Disease
O.A. Kolade, O. Oguntade and Lava Kumar
Virology/Germplasm Health Unit, IITA Ibadan
This field/lab guide is to assist you in screening landraces, elite clones, segregating populations and breeders lines of yam for resistance to Yam anthracnose disease (YAD) through:
Yam Anthracnose Disease (YAD) can cause up to 80% yield loss where it is endemic. Due to the losses incurred through the effect of diseases such as YAD, yam breeders and other affiliated scientists are trying to breed for plant materials with resistance to this disease. Resistance breeding is more acceptable in these days of climate change because they are more environment- friendly and cost effective. In order to be more effective in the breeding process, there is a need to be able to identify accurately and quickly, that is, early in the breeding cycle, plants with resistance to the diseases. Considering the importance of yams as an income generating staple, and its socio-cultural significance especially in West Africa, there is a need for the distribution of disease free yam propagules. This can be enhanced by being able to screen for the presence or absence of the disease. To do this effectively, we need to be able to identify the pathogen accurately, inoculate and take accurate readings of genotypic reaction to the disease in order to be able to proffer a lasting solution for its control.
Anthracnose is a fungal disease caused by many closely related fungi in the genus Colletotrichum, the pathogen responsible for the yam anthracnose disease is Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. It attacks mostly D. alata in the yam family; even though it can also attack other yam spps. The disease can affect the leaves, vines and tubers.
Types of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Cg)
According to the studies by Abang et al., (2002), there are four types of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in Nigeria: Slow growing grey (SGG), Fast growing grey (FGG), Fast growing salmon (FSG) and Slow growing Olive (SGO).
Figure 1. Typical growth patterns of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Ayodele et al., (2004)
Environmental condition favoring the development
Environment is a very important part of the disease triangle. In the case of YAD, moisture is required for the development and germination of the fungal spores as well as for infection of the plant. A humid and rainy environment enhances the growth and spread of the disease on the field.
Mode of transmission of YAD and control
It can be spread by wind, rain, insects and garden tools. It is mostly spread through rain splashes of the soil containing spores on the plants. The use of resistant variety is the best control, however fungicides can be applied and clearing and ploughing in of left over debris is encouraged as a cultural control because the pathogens can overwinter (remain dormant until a favourable condition starts) in the plant debris.
Description and field symptoms:
Symptoms include spots or blight. Severe infection results in vine dieback, defoliation and tuber
dry rot. About 7 types of spots and 4 types of blights have been identified as its symptoms on
yam leaves (Ayodele et al., 2004). It presents as a dark lesion which is usually surrounded with
a yellow halo. They can also be seen as dark brown rings surrounding a light brownish necrotic
portion. (Figures 2 and 3)
Figure 2. YAD symptoms on D.alata leaves (A = blight spreading along the veins, B, C and D= Spots, E= blight and F=blight on an old leaf)
Figure 3. Spot symptoms on D. rotundata leaves
Laboratory and field protocols
List of basic laboratory equipment needed for resistance screening
List of chemicals needed for resistance screening
Preparation of Potato Dextrose agar (PDA) media
Microorganisms can be grown in vitro for use in genetic and epidemiological studies which entails their isolation, purification and identification. This medium provides common nutrients which are found to be required in all living things such as carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, oxygen, iron and additional trace elements. These are present as micro and macro elements. Both macro and micro nutrients are critical in proper organismal growth as they play important roles in cellular and metabolic processes. Each nutrient is essential for growth and based on its concentration and presence or absence can control growth. C. gloeosporioides grows well on PDA media.
While screening samples on a large field for resistance, our main target is to identify those without so much symptoms and those who are totally symptom free. However, diseased samples must be collected from diverse kinds of symptoms for pathogen characterization. For example, different strains of organism can show symptoms of either spot or blight in which case the two isolates will be obtained, characterized and kept for future use. The samples must be well labelled. Host identity, location, name of collector, type of symptom and date should be written on sample bags or envelopes used for collection.
Isolation and organism identification
Isolation of organisms is key to pathogen identification; it involves the sampling of infected samples such as leaf samples, their surface disinfection and the plating and culturing of organisms in suitable medium. After growing the organism in optimal environmental conditions, the organism is identified under the microscope based on the morphology and growth pattern.
Or Pick the spores on infected part close to the living portion of plants and place on the PDA medium’s surface (Lactic acid acts as a selective antibiotic)
Preparation of Pure Culture
A pure culture can be obtained from isolating single colony from the starter culture; this enhances homogeneity of the cultures.
The growths observed on the aforementioned PDA media are thereafter transferred to fresh PDA as single cultures as follows:
Preparation of inoculum
Inoculum is a substance used for inoculation. Usually the causative pathogen is prepared in a solution and applied to an organism in order to infect such organisms. This is usually done in order to screen for resistance to such diseases. The concentration and the mode of application should be optimal for the pathogen in question. The preparation is as follows:
Storage techniques (Long, medium and short term)
It is difficult to maintain the pathogenicity, virulence and sporulating ability of phytopathogenic fungi if it is not well stored and maintained. Samples of isolates obtained from the field should therefore be well conserved for future use. The cultured isolates can be kept on slants or in glycerol in a -80oC freezer (long term) or -20oC for medium term storage. Short term storage should be done at 4oC.
Procedure for long term low temperature storage
Note: The tubes must be sterilized in the autoclave at 1210C for 15 mins.
Note: Each isolate should be replicated for storage at three different temperatures (4oC and -20oC and -80oC)
Rapid screening methods /inoculation techniques
Different methods have been proposed for rapid screening of plants for anthracnose resistance. The most important characteristic of any rapid selection technique is that it should mimic the infection process under natural conditions. The screening method should also be quick, economical and repeatable (Galvan, 2010).
The detached leaf assay is one of such screening methods that have been found to be a good estimate of what happens on the field. The whole plant assay is also used for resistance screening.
Detached leaf method
This involves the cutting of leaf from the growing plant (about 90days old) to see how they react
to inoculation with the causative pathogen of anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. The reaction has been found to be predictive of what happens in the field and therefore used for rapid screening. The procedure is as follows:
Caution: Avoid piercing the leaf surfaces with scalpel or forceps
Whole plant assay
This is done by inoculating all the leaves on a growing plant in the screen house or in a sick plot; the seedlings are sprayed using an atomizer with inoculum from the causal pathogen.
Digital imaging techniques (Visible imaging)
This involves the use of optical images for phenotyping. This technique is reliable in estimating disease severity in percentage. Computer software which can recognize and score colour differentiation is used to identify the diseased region relative to the total leaf area. This gives more accurate data. There are free and licensed software that can be used for this type of analysis. Images are scanned into the software and the diseased area is either calculated manually or automatically. Such software includes Image J (free), Leaf doctor (Pethybridge and Nelson, 2015) and Assess 2.0 (Lamari, 2008).
Procedure for the use of Leaf Doctor:
Note: Leaf doctor works with a black background while Assess 2.0 ® is best with blue or white
background. Pictures can be taken with specified background on the field or adjusted with an
image editor such as Adobe Fireworks ® or Magix ®
Alternatively for Assess 2.0
Caution: Use the same specifications on the scanner
Note: there are other types of digital imaging such as thermal imaging, spectral imaging which are dependent on fluorescence.
Plate 3: Typical pictures obtained from (A) Assess and (B) Leaf Doctor
Scale of measurement of severity
The use of uniform measuring scale will enhance a relatively fair comparison and harmonization of data collected by different raters
The scale that is being used for the germplasm identification is as follows:
1 = No symptoms and rated as highly resistant
2 = >1-25% area with symptoms and rated as resistant
3 = >25-50% area with symptoms and rated as moderately resistant
4 = > 50%-75% area with leaf symptoms and rated as susceptible
5 = >75% and about dying as a result of attack (Highly susceptible)
Similar or slightly modified version of the scales have been used by Green and Simon (1994), Abang et al., (2002), Onyeka et al., (2006), Aduramigba et al., (2008) and Popoola et al.,(2013).
Glossary of terms
Some of the important measurements which are taken on the field while screening for diseases generally include disease incidence, disease severity, and some factors to consider are resistance and tolerance. The definitions of these terminologies are as follows:
This is measure of the proportion of a plant community that is diseased , this works well in cases where the disease is an ‘all or nothing’ type, where any affected plant is inevitably killed, counts of affected plants can allow us to assess the effect of the disease.
This is a measure of the proportion of plant area that is affected and it is mostly useful when the disease is found in varying proportions on the field.
The capacity of an organism to defend itself against pathological processes or the agents of those processes
Tolerance is defined as the host's ability to offset the negative effects of infection, in this case, the plants recover in terms of symptoms expression
Susceptibility: The state of being easily affected or harmed by a pathogen
Abang M.M., Winter S., Green K.R., Hoffmann P., Mignouna H.D., Wolf G.A. 2002. Molecular identification of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides strains causing anthracnose of yam in Nigeria. Plant Pathol. 51: 63-71.
Aduramigba-Modupe A.O., Asiedu R. and Odebode A. C. 2008. Reaction of Dioscorea alata (water yam) to anthracnose disease in Nigeria Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol.6 (3&4): 248-252.
Ayodele M.A., Asiedu R. 2004. Field symptoms and laboratory of anthracnose diseases of D. alata IITA, 16 pages
Galvan J. 2010. Mass Screening Techniques for Selecting Crops Resistant to Disease IAEA publication pp 5-46.
Green K.R., Simons S.A. (1994). ‘Dead Skin’ on Yams (Dioscorea alata) caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Plant Pathol. 43: 1062-1065.
Lamari 2008 . Assess 2.0, Image analysis soft ware for plant disease quantification. The American Phytopathological Society 125pp
Onyeka T. J., Pétro D., Ano G., Etienne S. and Rubens S. 2006. Resistance in water yam (Dioscorea alata) cultivars in the French West Indies to anthracnose disease based on tissue culture-derived whole-plant assay Plant Pathology 55: 671–678
Popoola A. R., Adedibu B. O. and Ganiyu S. A. 2013. Rapid assessment of resistance of tissue-cultured water yam (Dioscorea alata) and white guinea yam (Dioscorea rotundata) to anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz.), Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 46:6, 663-669, DOI: 10.1080/03235408.2012.749701
Pethybridge S.J. and Nelson S.C. 2015. Leaf Doctor: A New Portable Application for Quantifying Plant Disease Severity. Plant Disease, Volume 99, Number 10 , Pages 1310-1316(doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0319-RE)
Collecting and preserving fungi: A manual for mycology 1999. SAFRINET, Baxter and Linde Ed. ARC- Plant protection Institute Pretoria South Africa. 86 pages
|1533056642wpdm_Screening for resistance to Yam Anthracnose Diseas1.pdf||Download|
|Screening for resistance to Yam Anthracnose Diseas1.pdf||Download|
|Screening for resistance to Yam Anthracnose Disease.docx||Download|